It is irrefutable that people live in an era abound with freedom nowadays. Mass media such as the internet, books, and newspapers are available to the citizens. However, few countries remain conservative, which indicates that the media would be censored by the government. In my view, I disagree with the prompt and I believe government should not control the media because it deprives people freedom of right, and my opinion would be elucidated as follows.
It is inappropriate to establish censorship toward the mass media as it oppresses the entire citizens. People possess the right to express their personal perspective and opinions about certain issues and situation. In the event that the media are under controlled by the authorities, people probably feel repressed about it. A case in point is that China regulates the content of the public media. Any content including the violence, pornography, or opposing political ideology would be barred by the central government. In this case, citizens in China are incapable of showing their own thoughts to the public. Thus, to control the media incurs negative effect on the society to some extent.
However, regulating the media could inflict positive influence on the entire nation as well. Though it is disadvantageous in terms of freedom of right in people, it could effectively protect the children from detrimental element. A compelling example of this can be seen in the internet─numerous of websites are inundated with violence and pornography in the present. In this case, children are often incompetent to distinguish right and wrong as they are mentally immature and may therefore, interfered harmfully by it. Hence, formulating censorship to regulate the mass media is imperative.
By way of conclusion, as argued above, controlling the public media could be conducive and detrimental to the whole society. However, it is of paramount importance for every nation to weigh a balance between it.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, may, so, therefore, thus, well, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32051282051 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03837363283 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548076923077 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9639701337 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2222222222 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72222222222 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184692205593 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596065263109 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524794619817 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111092954321 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213883582969 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.