Since the arrival of the advanced technology, exotic commodities such as food, brand, domestic equipment are available for every citizen. In that case, it is often argued that countries are getting resembled due to the fact that globalization enables people to buy the identical goods throughout the world. From my view of point, I opine that it is both positive and negative to the country.
First and foremost, the local features of certain countries are unable to highlight its characteristics once it is accessible for people in different nations. One compelling example of this can be seen in the fact that the bubble tea made in Taiwan is expanding its scale throughout the entire earth. In such case, people could relish the tasty delicacy from different countries, suggesting that bubble tea is no longer a traditional feature in Taiwan. As a result, globalization could impose negative impact on the local cultures.
Even more disturbing, though, is that the globalization brings about advantages for the citizens. People are capable to experience the exotic food pursuing the vogue of occidental countries in their own nations. A case in point is that the cosmopolitan city inundated with exotic restaurants provides great opportunity for people to savor the international delicacy without traveling abroad. In this case, people who are indigene could derive the benefit from it.
By way of conclusion, as I argued above, globalization could either inflict adverse implications and positive effects on the entire nation. It is vitally important that government should weigh against the merits and demerits of it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 414, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... traveling abroad. In this case, people who are indigene could derive the benefit from ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93066318972 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0725368378 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.846153846 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.38461538462 7.06120827912 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139152473237 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474224642932 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332903436548 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0779604836216 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036947311949 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.