Prior o the advent of globalization, people could merely access to local goods or trading with the nearby countries. However, since the advances of the transportation and the prevalence of global trade, commodities from over the world are available to every individual recently. It is often argued that free trade of goods is beneficial to the economy, while some people believe it poses great threat to the local industries. In my view, I opine that global trade is advantageous to economic growth.
People claim that international trade could boost the economic as it could facilitate consumption of citizens. If the global trade of goods thrives, people could access to products from all over the world. With its attractiveness of international products and brands, it could substantially bolster the citizens to consume. A case in point is that renowned sport brands like "Nike" has appealed thousands of people who keen on athletic items, and therefore, obtained tremendous amount of sales and incomes. As a result, global trade is conducive to boost the economic growth.
On the other hand, some people contend the flourish of international trade would exert adverse effect on local industries owing to the fact that international product has dominant influence in the market. People are inclinned to purchase the goods from country as it is often more prestigious. Thus, the local industries are overshadowed by those international items and brands. To demonstrate, television in Taiwan has inferior domestic sales with comparison with that of Japanese.
All in all, I reiterate my opinion as argued above. I firmly believe global trade is favorable to economic growth as it could stimulate people's motivation of consumption.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, as a result, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37090909091 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0692287776 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530909090909 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6692707539 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16953899566 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642829238392 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536158837579 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111858999569 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377648257814 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.