Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Discovering the world is always a desire of many people, in which travelling and enjoying interesting things are not only exciting but also very useful. However, nowadays, with the help of technology and modern transport, people are able to buy specialities anywhere in the world. In my opinion, this is a negative development that may make an impact on lots of aspects.
On the one hand, that countries are becoming more and more similar by buying the same goods can cause some serious consequences. First of all, specialities of each country like sushi, Pho may lose their own characteristics. For instance, " Banh Chung" is native to Vietnam, associating with many traditional songs, stories , the way to make and eat..v...v; nevertheless, if it is sold in many places in the world, these features will disappear immediately. This will lose good cultural values of national citizens. Moreover, people can become lazier and lazier because they have ability to not only eat specialities of many countries but also watch short movies, images about those nations without spending time visiting. As a consequence, it is possible for different countries around the world to lower income when the number of tourists is gradually declining., resulting in financial difficulties.
On the other hand, this also gives us many advantages. For example, everybody, especially people with hard condition will have more opportunities to experience specialities, cultures or costumes of a lot of nations in the world. Therefore, it is super-easy for them to widen their knowledge and improve the relationship with others. Moreover, different countries can help each other based on long-term so-operation, leading to a peaceful and happy world.
In general, the governments of each country are allowed to import products of different nations but not too much, have to make a balance between domestic and international goods to give benefits to their residents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 333, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ing with many traditional songs, stories , the way to make and eat..v...v; neverth...
^^
Line 2, column 359, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...songs, stories , the way to make and eat..v...v; nevertheless, if it is sold in ma...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in general, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3430420712 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05281467164 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601941747573 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0634207203 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.928571429 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4285714286 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254455571939 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791713288101 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770686301265 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133334675917 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594741041176 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.