Anybody can use a mobile phone to answer the work and personal calls at any time or 7 days a week. Does this development have more positive or negative effects on both individuals and society?
In the technology era, electronic devices are greatly helping human in life, especially mobile phones. Nowadays, people can use their phones to work or making individual calls at any time. Although there are some negative consequences of this evolution on individuals and society, I believe that they are outweighed by the positive effect.
On the one hand, mobile phones eliminated the major constraint that the world has faced a long time: geographical distance and human can profit from it. To be more specific, mobile phones allow great flexibility, which enables instant exchange of information related to both work and personal matter. Globalization era requires a great deal of transnational collaboration between staff in different offices and also, between the companies and their partner. Thus, access to mobile phone communication regardless of time and location ensures work efficiency for individuals, organizations, and eventually the society's economy as a whole. For example, the latest statistics from the U.S Census points out that more than 75% of 30,000 surveyed employees say that they work more effectively thanks to mobile phones. Furthermore, a person who only needs a mobile phone to keep in touch with their loved one anywhere in the world. This helps people to establish intimate relationships with family, friends and colleagues.
However, going along with the benefits of mobile phone are its negative effects that we need to consider. It is apparent that easy interaction on mobile phones reduces the time for social interaction. In other words, people whose mobile phone's usage is heavy face shortage of real human face-to-face contact, which causes their emotion negative impacts. In addition, excessive phone use significantly affects user's healthy such as eyes damage, increased stress and impaired immune system. For example, a study conducted at Queen Mary's School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine shows that 92% of tested mobile phones contained the E. Coli virus.
In conclusion, despite a few drawbacks, it is undeniable that the use of mobile phones for work and personal calls brings about more benefits to individuals and society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 684, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...ample, the latest statistics from the U.S Census points out that more than 75% of...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1842.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43362831858 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8436333369 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619469026549 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1940298695 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.125 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1875 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360575834958 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108453494651 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842733727172 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237870103621 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557975522235 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.