There are more workers to work from home and more students to study from home. This is because computer technology is more accessible and cheaper. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
In the technological era today, PC technology is cheaper and affordable and more and more approachable to all walks of life. Therefore, many people are opting to work and study from their home. In my perspective, this tendency brings both positive and negative impacts.
On the one hand, there is some certain disadvantage of working and distance learning. First of all, it can be isolation, stubbornness, lack of professionalism and loss of promotion opportunities in their career because there is no active supervision so it is possible that employees working from home will be negligent, involuntary and lack of focus on work goals. In addition, a limitation should be considered, with the form of remote working, the information connection with organizations will be loose, they will rarely exchange and share with their colleagues and that will make them feel that strange to the development of their company. There is a wide range of options for entertainment such as films, music and games broadcasted on the internet, which easily make distracted online learners. Distance learning, hence, requires steely determination and study through the internet may not be really effective without this quality.
However, this trend also has some noticeable benefits. Firstly, working at home brings for workers the comfort and freedom everyone wants. They will not need to comply with workplace rules such as dress, style, time and location. Secondly, this form of work not only help employees and company saving travel expenses but also avoid traffic congestion, which is of common occurrence in major cities. Tele-learning meets the need of learners who want to learn anytime and anywhere they want. It saves educational time for students, according to compared to traditional training methods, studying from home help pupils save about 20% to 40% of the time due to reduced moving time.
In conclusion, for the reasons aforementioned above, I think that advantageous impacts of this tendency can overshadow that of disadvantage.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35202492212 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98762827189 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626168224299 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.9076497082 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.533333333 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0666666667 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249911788855 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073322508781 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729409565611 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156672769361 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130857537024 0.056905535591 230% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.