As life expectancy is increasing, people work after retirement with pay. Alternatively, some people start to work at a young age. Are these positive or negative impacts?
Thanks to advances in technology and medicine, the average human lifespan has increased, so many people decide to continue working after the legal age of retirement. The fact is that as human life expectancy grows, only a number of jobs will ensure that people are able to enjoy a comfortable retirement, and therefore, many people are joining the workplace much earlier than before. In my view, I believe both patterns have distinct positive and negative effects.
On the one hand, the young generation early starting a job will have the opportunity to accumulate valuable experience. With the amount variety of work youngsters can do, they will be practised in various position, such as waiter/waitress, bartending or tutoring. They capably learn more skill like working group, cooperate and make friends with people of dissimilar characteristics and these help them to become wiser and more mature. However, the quantity of money can be earned through most part-time jobs certainly do not enough to contribute to their retirement. In addition, many high paying jobs, such as lawyers and doctors, require a qualification that can take up 6 years to acquire, and therefore are not possible for young people to do at a young age.
On the other hand, working after retirement, first of all, is a method of keeping people not only mentally but also physically healthy, which is vital for the elder. For example, a study published in the Journal of the American Medical Directors Association found that mental and physical activities involved in the working process led to significant improvements in arthritic and mental illness. Nevertheless, elders who affected by the ageing process would not be able to undertake high-intensity and high-pressure jobs, which reduces working performance and makes them easy injured when it comes to excessively strength demanding jobs.
In conclusion, as the aforementioned opinion, I think each individual should be careful when deciding whether to go to work early or to work after retirement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-12 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
| 2019-04-04 | Jenny Trang Nguyen | 66 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005. 84
- Many people say that universities should only offer places to young students with the highest marks while others say they should accept people of all ages even if they did not do well at school Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- The bar chart shows the distribution of employment among agriculture services industries in three countries in 1980 and projected distribution in 2020 84
- The graph below shows UK air pollutants in millions of tonnes from three di erent sources between 1990 and 2005 89
- The table and graph below give information about cinema attendance in Australia between 1994 and 2002 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1714.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27384615385 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9896009114 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621538461538 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.2483118163 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.833333333 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0833333333 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5 7.06120827912 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30925672574 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983350907369 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517850236737 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167411771108 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449499480909 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.