As life expectancy is increasing, people work after retirement with pay. Alternatively, some people start to work at a young age. Are these positive or negative impacts?
These days, people are likely to live longer, they tend to continue their work with pay, while others choose to work at a young age. I personally believe that this trend has several detrimental impacts on people’s life as well as a nation’s economy and society as a whole.
On the one hand, since the living standards nowadays are much better than they used to, life expectancy is increasing. This results in the popularity of working with salary after retirement in many nations, which causes some certain demerits. Firstly, elderly people are not physically and mentally healthy enough to fully concentrate on the work compared to young workers. It could lead to negative influences on organizations where they are working for since their employer could pay them more but receive less contribution. Furthermore, elderly employees’ working in a long run can lead to a fierce competition for job seekers in the current job market. In terms of social aspect, government shall allocate more fund to health care service for elderly citizens at the expense of other social welfare services for others.
On the other hand, I am convinced that working at early age has several disadvantages for personal life. One of the negatives is that young workers tend to be immature, they do not have full knowledge about labor code and working regulations. They, as a result, could suffer labor abuse when working in unscrupulous corporations. Another prominent drawback could be that many laborers at a young age are only offered menial jobs due to lack of qualifications and experiences. When working at low-skilled jobs, they shall get low salary without benefits from employers.
In conclusion, in light of reasons I have mentioned above, I am of the opinion that working after retirement or at a young age could be detrimental to employee’s life as well as society as a whole.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-12 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
| 2019-04-04 | Jenny Trang Nguyen | 66 | view |
- As life expectancy is increasing people work after retirement with pay Alternatively some people start to work at a young age Are these positive or negative impacts 66
- It is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people than that of young people in many countries in the future.Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 61
- In many countries, more and more people choose to buy imported food rather than food produced locally. Why people buy imported food? What could be done to encourage people to buy local food? 67
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- International tourism is becoming the world’s biggest industry. Unfortunately, it often creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07717041801 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94371541561 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578778135048 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8956602914 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.785714286 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2142857143 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383201302761 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125974533928 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809123869775 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241271424096 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563667615975 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.