Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies, factories and their employees to the countryside. Do you agree or disagree?
It has been observed that moving corporations, manufactory plants and their workers to other suburbs plays an important role in coping with traffic and housing concerns. I personally agree with this view because of several reasons.
To begin with, moving large business organizations, factories and their staff to smaller regional towns makes a great contribution to dealing with traffic problems in some extents. The main contribution is reduction of traffic congestion which has become one of the serious concerns in many cities nowadays. Indeed, each person has their own vehicle for commuting on a daily basis. In urban areas where there would be a huge traffic volume on streets, leading to inevitable traffic jams, especially in rush hours. Therefore, the more people leave, the less vehicles will be, as a result, severe traffic congestion can be tackled to some extent.
On the other hand, there are plausible reasons why this moving help deal with housing problems. One of compelling reason is that the decline of housing price will be advantageous for city dwellers who are struggling with it. Houses are too unaffordable for citizens while not many employees are well-paid by their employer. Furthermore, urban citizens’ accommodation can be tackled by the construction of more apartments. In fact, moving out from densely-populated places will leave more lands for people to build more residential houses and apartments.
In conclusion, for the reasons I have mentioned above, I am strongly convinced that relocating big-sized companies, factories and their human resources contributes greatly to solving both traffic and housing challenges in crowded places.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 553, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun vehicles is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
.... Therefore, the more people leave, the less vehicles will be, as a result, severe t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d housing challenges in crowded places.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49230769231 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9832966952 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634615384615 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1240236991 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.846153846 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280027147876 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880231083694 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469214342836 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158259493402 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275702384562 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.