Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is said that it is unessential to spend money on the maintenance of public libraries as their functions are being replaced by computer revolutionization. Although certain benefits that online libraries can offer, I would argue that traditional public libraries should be maintained due to several reasons.
On the one hand, it is true that computer technology is increasingly developing and for this reason, virtual libraries seem to be used as an alternative for conventional libraries. In fact, thanks to the appearance of computer and revolutionized technology, a limitless supply of digital-based information with up-to-date reading materials has been served for many people who have preference to reading thru the internet. Moreover, e-book readers find it more convenient to have access to digital library resources in anytime and anywhere compared to public libraries.
However, I believe that traditional libraries are unreplaceable, so it is necessary to have them maintained due to several reasons. One of them is that public libraries archive worthy sources of materials, ranging from copyrighted manuscripts to rare books of reputable writers, which are more likely to be unavailable in online libraries. More importantly, library users can read more reliable sources of information, while the content of online sources tend to be uncensored leading to a misinformed public. Another compelling reason is that compared to digital libraries, traditional ones offer a quiet space for those who need fully concentrate on reading their favourite things.
In conclusion, for the reasons I have mentioned above, although digital libraries play an important role in storing a great amount of information and their convenience, I am strongly convinced that public libraries should be maintained for a long time in order to maintain a well-informed society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er to maintain a well-informed society.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, so, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5985915493 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25355161256 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566901408451 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.8664809653 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.0 106.682146367 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185918929152 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839990904677 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555905035539 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129010369256 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503522162966 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.0946893788 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.