International tourism is becoming the world’s biggest industry. Unfortunately, it often creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, it has been claimed that more tension than understanding between people from different cultures could be caused by the popularity of international tourism. In my opinion, I disagree with this view as I believe that this trend will promote cultural exchanges worldwide rather than conflicts.
On the one hand, it is true that there are some certain conflicts once the tourism industry is sharply developing nowadays. Firstly, debates between nations could stem from language barriers. Indeed, when tourists travel to foreign countries, the difference of language can lead to misunderstanding when communicating with local people, conflicts, as a result will occur. Furthermore, international travellers could negatively impact on local culture. If they have some words or manners which are unsuitable for indigenous culture, they would bother or cause the sense of irritation to local people to some extent.
However, I would argue that the development of international tourism could bring more merits for countries in worldwide. One of which is that this trend will boost cultural exchange on a global scale. Thanks to the significant increasing number of global travellers, nowadays traditional performance from Asian has been welcomed in Western countries, while Western fashion trends and model of architecture are spreading to Asian continents. Moreover, this development has stimulated the interest in indigenous cuisine that help hospitality industry witness a dramatic growth all over the world. Since then, it is more likely to promote the better understanding and open attitudes between tourists and local inhabitants.
In conclusion, for the reasons I have mentioned above, it is true that the development of international tourism could create tension to some extent, I am convinced that this trend will help better understanding and even promoting open attitudes among both travellers and local people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, while, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62671232877 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03792218389 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571917808219 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8516904696 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.384615385 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181352503895 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637368556966 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064876198044 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125487524894 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642224077697 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.