It is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people than that of young people in many countries in the future.
Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
It is expected that in some parts of the world, the aged population will become more increasingly compared to young age. In my opinion, this development has both positive and negative effects to family and society in an equal measure.
On the one hand, elderly citizens can bring some benefits to their family and country. One of these advantages is the burden of childcare of parents would be significantly decrease thanks to the willing helps of healthy grandparents. Indeed, grandparents can contribute greatly to looking after children since nowadays parents are engrossed in working in the daytime. Thanks to this, the bonds between grandparents and grandchildren would be cultivated and become more close-knit. Furthermore, elderly people possess traditional values and rich experience compared to young ones. Therefore, they can become perfect advisers or guiders for youngsters when living or working with them.
On the other hand, the increasing percentage of popularity of elderly people in many countries of the world can lead to negative effects to society in some aspects. One of them is that governments must pay pensions for longer. It leads to high pressure on the economy of a nation. More seriously, governments need more health facilities for their elderly citizens. In fact, they must invest more fund in constructing more hospitals or clinics at expense of other social welfare services, such as infrastructure or education.
In conclusion, for the reasons I have mentioned above, I believe that the higher proportion of older people than that of young people in many countries can bring both advantageous and disadvantageous effects to family and society as a whole.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, so, therefore, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35074626866 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98334838146 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570895522388 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5367969395 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.428571429 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215463736318 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612961396622 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845748085076 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146649813254 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0955801710341 0.056905535591 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.