Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies, factories and their employees to the countryside. Do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies, factories and their employees to the countryside. Do you agree or disagree?

To tackle the problems of traffic congestion and the shortage of housing, it is suggested that large companies and factories in major cities should be relocated to the rural area. I think this policy can be difficult to implement, with possible objections and negative outcomes.
The strategy of business relocation seems to be infeasible, considering the negative outcomes that may cause. Firstly, the public transportation network in the countryside might be extremely poor or even not be covered. It is not practical for people to rely on the public transportation daily. In this case, people might prefer to drive private cars to work, and it would unexpectedly impose a heavy burden on the road transportation. For instance, the rural infrastructure is relatively backward and life is less convenient. People need to travel between the countryside and the city frequently, leading to new traffic problems
Secondly, it might affect the business benefits of the companies. Some companies might rely on the regional clients and suppliers. In this case, relocation might lead to loss of customers and increase the cost of the product. It may impact the sales of some companies whose customers mainly come from the urban area. Also, the employees may reject to move to the countryside, as they can no longer enjoy the high-quality educational resources, medical services and entertainment facilities in the city. For example, the recent survey done by Ministry of urban development shows that 75% of people in rural areas want to migrate to urban areas because of better basic amenities available in the city.
In conclusion, some people say that traffic congestion and the shortage of housing could be tackled by relocating companies and employees to the rural areas, but in my opinion, it does not effectively solve the problem and might trigger other side effects.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22591362126 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95707938605 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551495016611 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1790775944 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.357142857 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174123158323 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505097604253 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652485972926 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118397333357 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600140382211 0.056905535591 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.