The average standard of people s health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement

Essay topics:

The average standard of people's health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Nowadays, people tend to have less work to do owing to technology; therefore, some maintain that in the future, our health might decline. This essay sets out to show a strong disagreement and also argue that the statement is false.

There are few points supporting the idea that human’s health could be worse by the time. It is true that technology creating robots and virtual intelligence have been developed, which means soon, those physical works, such as house choirs, building and shipping, would be handled by robots. One illustration for this is the wiping robot. Most houses in cities have their own wiping-house robot which can clean floors automatically. What is special about this kind of robot is the ability to recognize liquid and solid in order to clean with a suitable method.

Nevertheless, due to the improvement of both medication and science in the future, I believe that our health in average will be higher compared to the present. Those improvements allow experts to create a variety of vaccines to prevent viruses and sickness, which could be a major threat to our existence. Taking covid-19 for an example, thanks to the vaccine, millions of people have been saved. This would not happen if the covid took place in the past.

Additionally, exercising and working out daily are the major elements of gaining good health. As long as people have an awareness about exercising and eating a sustainable diet, their health will be engaged, not only physically but also mentally.

All in all, from where I stand, I mostly support the fact that people’ health seems to strengthen over time.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lso argue that the statement is false. There are few points supporting the idea...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...order to clean with a suitable method. Nevertheless, due to the improvement of ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n if the covid took place in the past. Additionally, exercising and working out...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...not only physically but also mentally. All in all, from where I stand, I mostly...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, kind of, such as, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02222222222 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67738586344 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62962962963 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4860772239 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8571428571 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178408753644 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057865276527 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0297073709094 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924131548372 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198204341939 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.