It is the case that in the presence of children’s long duration spent indoors, as a result, it hinders in limited experience to be equipped, which is regarded as a drawback to the majority of children in due course. In the essay, I will describe how lack of exposing in the world is infavorable.
Having stayed long indoors can have a detrimental impact on children in learning workplace in real life. Most often, they do not acquire knowhow in the processing in workplace with limited communication. As they are grown up, the way on getting used to work might be hindered. Since they are equipped with inadequate potentials, and work with lack of experience gained, they will be regarded as incapable and not productive to survive in nature.
Another negative effect on children is that they might find hard to communicate with others. The reason is that they may fear their words will be twisted and used against them. As they were isolated from society from a long while and learn nothing about interpersonal relationships, how one another get along and so on. They are used to communicating with friends in the internet social chat groups online, which is lack of face-to-face conversations and fail to look into the true character of others. As they speak, no matter what, they will be feared in looking into others’ eyes and what have said hurt others’ feelings. They would simply shut down and they become isolated when working in society.
In summary, children getting in touch with the outside world, is something should not be neglected. Thus, the negative effects on them can be disastrous, in terms of future work experience as well as social barrier.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, may, so, thus, well, while, in summary, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95070422535 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82546234321 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556338028169 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.030601356 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.428571429 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247050826905 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894226828754 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546342253754 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156098406559 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528354249951 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.