It is the case that in the presence of children’s long duration spent indoors, as a result, it hinders in limited experience to be equipped, which is regarded as a drawback to the majority of children. In the essay, I will describe how lack of exposure in the world is not favorable.
Staying long indoors can have a detrimental impact on children in learning workplace. Most often, they acquire little knowhow in the processing in workplace with limited communication. As they grow up, the way on getting used to work is hindered. Since they are [both] equipped with inadequate potentials and work with lack of experience gained, they will be regarded as not capable and productive enough to survive in nature.
Another negative effect on children is that they might find hard to communicate with others. They may fear their words will be twisted and used against them. As they were isolated from society from a long while and learnt little about interpersonal relationships, how one another get along and so on. They are used to communicate with friends in the internet social chat groups, [but] with lack of face-to-face conversations and fail to look into people’s true character. As they speak they [either] fear in looking into others’ eyes [or] they fear might hurt others’ feelings. They would simply shut down and become isolated in society in a long term.
In summary, children getting in touch with the outside world is something should not be neglected. Thus, the negative effects on them can be disastrous, in terms of future work experience as well as social barrier.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[5]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'used to communicating'.
Suggestion: used to communicating
...e another get along and so on. They are used to communicate with friends in the internet social cha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, may, so, thus, well, while, in summary, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04119850187 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8737259298 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554307116105 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9336814682 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1428571429 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262065937323 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933566011735 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430791026754 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163078799027 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531172621465 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.