Many cities around the world are troubled by the bad condition of transport, especially some megacities where the commuters usually suffer from traffic congestion at the same time of day. People argue that the government should offer free public transportation all day. I disagree with this opinion, and I believe that this service is not the best way and other measures should be taken.
In my opinion, there is no doubt that zero-fare transport plays a significant role in easing traffic jams which is the critical public issue focused by the government and the people. However, no matter how attractive it is, people cannot live without using private cars as there may be some emergency in their life. Thus, providing free transport solely contribute to decreasing the number of private vehicle to some extent. What is more, there are many megacities like Beijing still suffering from an awful traffic condition in narrow roads with out-of-date infrastructure in spite of the increase in availability of public transport. I would argue that the street needs to be widened and the machine of traffic management and operation should be updated.
I also disagree with the idea that zero-fare transport should be provided in 24 hours per day. It is a substantial waste that authority chooses to combat the problem via offering people a free traffic service under any circumstance, leaving a burden on the government budget. Traffic jams mainly occur during the rush hour. Consequently, it is useless to provide this service all the time. It would be more economical if the money used to take such unrealistic measures were invested in enhancing road facilities.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that other measures rather than providing free transport may be more efficient to traffic congestion. Meanwhile, more investment in the road system should be distributed to allow commuters to feel more comfortable and convenient.
- International travel makes people prejudiced rather than broad-minded. What are its causes and what measures can be taken to solve this problem? 89
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some students take one year off between finishing school and going to university, in order to travel or to work. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- International travel makes people prejudiced rather than broad-minded. What are its causes and what measures can be taken to solve this problem? 67
- It is more important for a building to serve a purpose than to look beautiful Architects should not worry about producing building as a work of art 93
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, so, still, thus, while, in conclusion, no doubt, in my opinion, in spite of, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22186495177 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83482778865 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569131832797 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9880971912 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.266666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264518563682 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901679513271 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750154639266 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162279083274 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652422854362 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.