The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic
congestion is providing free public transport in 24 hours per day, and seven days a week.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There are some opinions argue that the most efficient way to reduce traffic jams in the city is providing free public transportation for all day and every day. From my perspective, I support the idea that public transportation is a fine way to prevent traffic congestions; however, I do not think it is possible to make it free with full service at all time in week.
Public transportation is essential not just in terms of commuting but as a means of reducing traffic congestions. There are several reasons lead to traffic jams. Firstly, it happens mostly in rush hours which can be solved if you use public transportations. The system works based on its timing schedule so everything must go in the right other; hence, the traffic flow will be improved. Secondly, also the main reason leads to traffic jam is because there are so many individual vehicles occur on the street, by this reason, public transportation is definitely a great choice to decrease the number of cars and motorbikes. Lastly, traffic congestions also come from crashes and accidents, which can be minimize by using public transportations since it requires the drivers must always be in consciousness.
On the other hand, it is impractical to make it free. If the passengers do not pay for their trip, then who is going to pay for the drivers, the fuels or any essential elements? This will lead to higher taxes which can cause disapproval or even demonstrations. Moreover, the companies are not likely to provide their top service because of the low profit. Therefore, I think it should be in affordable price or with promotions, thus, it will be more realistic and possible but still can encourage people to use public transportations.
In conclusion, public transport plays a vital role in our daily life, especially in dense population cities, its network should be expanded to bring convenience to people and also to reduce the number of traffic jams.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, thus, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95398773006 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00123708921 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567484662577 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2992368767 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.357142857 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2857142857 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179772090693 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627851332791 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06930117623 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113964852138 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856983655736 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.