The best way to resolve the international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It has been argued that no measures can tackle multinational heated environmental issues more effectively than lifting up fuel cost. While I accept that more expensive energy may remedy a number of ecological concerns, I believe that there are several solutions which are more beneficial.
On the one hand, gaining petroleum price is recognized to alleviate many environmental obstacles. Indeed, when energy becomes exorbitant, its financial burden may prompt citizens to decline their uses of private vehicles, which is accompanied by a decrease in exhausted gases. For example, when Amsterdam authority adopted a policy to upsurge fuel cost by 30%, traffic flow in rush hours was eased dramatically, and that resulted in a cut down of 15% in greenhouse gas emission. In other words, fossil energy available in a higher price inevitably leads to an adaption among residents, thanks to which they unintentionally take action on air pollution. By contrast, if fuel cost remains affordable, people are less likely to adjust their commuting habits, so the atmosphere will continues to be enormously contaminated.
On the other hand, numerous efficient measures are considered as solutions that can overshadow the aforementioned proposal. To begin with, it is highly recommended that locals should construct wind farms or install solar panel to yield corresponding types of energy. In fact, unlike using fuel, which gradually depletes finite natural resources, a switch to such applications can offer more sustainable options since they are renewable. In addition, adopting a more eco-friendly strategy, which can reduce energy consumption and pollutants, is also urgent for industry sector. Indeed, not only can this resolve ecological challenges but also diminish its reliance on fossil fuel, which is risky due to its predicted scarcity and fluctuating cost.
Briefly, while not disavowing the advantages of increasing finite energy price, I opine that many resolutions offer more significant benefits in fighting against environmental issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
- Art is considered an essential part of all cultures throughout the world However these days fewer and fewer people appreciate art and turn their focus to science technology and business Why do you think that is What could be done to encourage more people 89
- The pie charts below show the main regions that received exports from 3 Latin America countries in 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 78
- Organized tours to remote places and communities is increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and environment 89
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers not people Why Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- The line graph below provides the number of international conferences in three cities from 1965 to 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 780, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'continue'
Suggestion: continue
...ommuting habits, so the atmosphere will continues to be enormously contaminated. On t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, if, may, so, while, for example, in addition, in fact, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62580645161 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06672246552 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670967741935 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.1702935588 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 134.153846154 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8461538462 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10056935434 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0345397945444 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364839441875 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0627289166736 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00594090810178 0.056905535591 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.99 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.