Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays.
Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Studies have indicated that broadband connection is applied to many kinds of gathering in business. While its drawbacks are discernible, I opine that this tendency offered more benefits.
On the one hand, there are two important minuses when business assemblies are supported by the Internet. From training perspective, most actual circumstances occur as a result of real interaction, whereas online classes can offer individual curricula so that face-to-face communication becomes redundant. Therefore, such pedagogical approach may contribute to a lack of hands-on experience among learners, constraining them to put knowledge gained into practice. Additionally, from health perspective, since a number of activities are carried out online, a long exposure to computer, staying parallel with an accidentally adopted sedentary lifestyle, is inevitable. Consequently, if no accompanying physical activities are provided, residents may be prone to a variety of health concern, like refractive errors or obesity.
On the other hand, I consent with the implication of the trend towards conducting business through broadband connection for social betterment because of its advantages. Firstly, it is recognized that the Internet has facilitated partnership and management. Indeed, thanks to leading-edge technologies like video conferencing, entrepreneurs have been enabled to reach a consensus with partners, or keep abreast of their companies despite long distances. Secondly, no sooner are these technological advancements applied than business becomes more financially effective. Specifically, online business gatherings, in which infrastructure and commuting are unnecessary, are believed to significantly reduce overhead cost and, therefore, uplift the benefit for enterprises.
Briefly, while meeting, discussions and training taking place online may exert negative impacts, it seems to me that they will be outweighed by the advantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, while, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.17647058824 5.12529762239 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39536340427 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.713235294118 0.561755894193 127% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0124517543 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.230769231 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103160557598 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0305671609892 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420220995604 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0637447663614 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536474709292 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 17.34 50.2224549098 35% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.56 12.4159519038 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.42 8.58950901804 133% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.