The provided pie charts compare 3 nations, namely Argentina, Chile and Mexico, in terms of the markets they maintained trade exchange in 2004.
Generally, products from 3 surveyed countries were received by all 4 regions. However, there was a remarkable difference between the major markets of each individual counterpart.
Turning into detail, followed by a nearly one fourth of Europe, remaining Latin American nations, which occupied 41% of total exported goods, was the most prevalent market for Chilean manufacturers. However, in Argentina, its over-30-per-cent proportion was surpassed by other regions, which accounted for 41%. Nevertheless, the percentages of 10% and 19%, respectively, reflected that America was the least common target for products from both Argentina and Chile.
Regarding to Mexico, although it exported to all surveyed areas, unbalanced distribution among markets were easily observed. Specifically, 87% of total Mexico’s export turnover stemmed from the USA, ranking first among 4 sectors, whereas the number for other Latin American countries was only 2%. Meanwhile, Europe and other regions categories occupied similar percentages, with 6% and 5%, correspondingly.
- Online shopping is increasing dramatically How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of jobs required 89
- The information below gives details about the household income and spending on food and clothes by an avarage family in a UK city in 2010 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 84
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since there is computer technology To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The pie charts below show the main regions that received exports from 3 Latin America countries in 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 78
- Art is considered an essential part of all cultures throughout the world However these days fewer and fewer people appreciate art and turn their focus to science technology and business Why do you think that is What could be done to encourage more people 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...markets of each individual counterpart. Turning into detail, followed by a nearl...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.92 4.92477711251 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12366085593 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.697142857143 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0616755635 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.111111111 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119448541131 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494996000258 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379453702445 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0741275002772 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0154988972637 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 11.4140731707 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.06136585366 131% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.