Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end poverty and hunger. Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and must be stopped. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
Social members have sparked off a heated controversy over the impacts of economic growth on the society. While many residents justify that only by such prosperity will impoverishment and food shortage be addressed, I opine that it must be terminated due to its ecological destruction.
On the one hand, the chief cause making citizens in favor of economic gain is its essence in tackling welfare concerns. To begin with, a growing profit is believed to motivate enterprises to grow their business and, hence, lead to a rising demand on employees. Therefore, more jobs are created, and this can contribute to a more stable income for the grass roots, which enables them to sustainably lacerate the poverty line. In addition, it is also economic upswing that facilitates the authority accomplish its poverty alleviating and nutritional objectives. Indeed, the higher revenue firms earn, they more money they will trickle down as tax, by which the government can provide funding for such projects as infrastructure upgrade, unemployment benefits, or sufficient food for the disadvantaged.
On the other hand, personally, I have adopted a negative attitude towards economic growth because the world has spent centuries establishing prosperity at the expense of our pristine environment. Specifically, to maintain production, nations inevitably consume natural components like fossil fuels, soil or water; consequently, not only does it exert burdens on finite resources, but also irreversibly contaminate the ecological system. For example, after doubling its GDP compared to 30 years ago, Vietnam suffers from an enormous diminish in air quality, with a rise of 120% in particulate matters and greenhouse gases. Thus, economic growth must be halted to prevent firms from exploiting the nature so massively that the planet would be no longer habitable. Otherwise, if there is no adjustment in how we boost the economy, destruction will be perpetuated, and crises like global warming or ozone layer depletion will be exacerbated, which cannot be compensated by any financial abundance.
Briefly, although the link between economic expansion and mitigation of poverty and malnourishment is indisputable, I believe that ending it for the sake of our environment is a more favorable approach.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vironment is a more favorable approach.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, consequently, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in addition, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1943.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50424929178 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10706376308 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665722379603 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.0307853572 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.461538462 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1538461538 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183607404579 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629559719814 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052438537552 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113431769147 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360898405592 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.79 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 78.4519038076 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vironment is a more favorable approach.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, consequently, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in addition, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1943.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50424929178 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10706376308 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665722379603 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.0307853572 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.461538462 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1538461538 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183607404579 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629559719814 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052438537552 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113431769147 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360898405592 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.79 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 78.4519038076 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.