It is argued that raising fuel prices is the most effective measure to address the problems of the environment. While this approach can potentially reduce the amount of emission emitted in the atmosphere, I believe that a global awareness campaign would be a more practical method to deal with the root causes of environmental problems.
Undoubtedly, increasing the cost of fuel can potentially cut down emissions in big cities, which pollutes the air. In reality, vehicles release vast amount of noxious fumes, such carbon dioxide or nitrogen, into the atmosphere every second, leading to increasingly more polluted. Thus, requiring individuals to pay higher costs for their journey can encourage them to less rely on their private vehicles, ultimately leading them to choose more environmentally-friendly modes of transportation, including buses or electric bikes. According to the Land transport authority, after the Singaporeance government implemented a 20% increase in fuel prices in 2019, there was a 2.2% rise in daily bus ridership in the first quarter, compared to the same period last years. This consequently leads to reduce private vehicles, which can limit the amount of fumes.
However, this measure does not fully address the underlying causes of environmental issues. Moreover, these problems can stem from various factors, such as the use of plastic bags when shopping or the use of harmful chemicals in industry and argiculture, which contaminates both land and water. Therefore, running a worldwide campain to raise customers’ awareness about the importance of environmental costs. Furthermore, this program promotes the use of eco-friendly practices in farming and manufacturing, including reducing the consumption of noxious substances and adopting renewable engery sources. Sweden has been implementing sustainable farming practices by reducing pesicide usage and organic farming, to promote biodiversity and mitigate ecological impact of argiculture.
In conclusion, while increasing fuel costs can reduce harmful fumes in the air by discourage people from using private vehicles, I am of the option that running a worldwide awareness campaign will be the most effective measure to deal with the underlying causes of environmental issues. I am also convinced that once this approach is taken, there will be more people being more awareness the importance of environmental protection.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, however, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2054.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65840220386 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23995988278 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570247933884 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.7318041953 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.714285714 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9285714286 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123473323461 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470576506329 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421186223328 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0804292959498 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232235364319 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.