The best way to solve world's environmental problem is increase the cost of fuel.
Do you agree or disagree and give your own opinion?
The main challenges of present modern era are contribute to the environment and its problems. A plenty of research has been done to address these issues but it seems that there are several causes that impact the environment significantly. Despite the fact that some commentators believe the expensive fuel result in removing all environment problems, but I think this idea not only is able to solve the problems, but also, brings a new set of concerns.
First of all, it is noteworthy to say the large part of mentioned problems, such as global warming, the Ozen layer depletion, increase the amount of greenhouse gases, is man-made problems which is directly contributed to the amount of fuel usage. According to the latest figures, the amount of CO2 foot-print has increased significantly through last decades due to the boost in the number of the cars or industrial vehicles. The most efficient solution to address these problems is to increase the quality of then fuel or replacing the fossil fuel with some renewable source of energy like solar or wind energy. Also, some restricted laws and standard should be set as a measure to control the amount of car and factories emission.
On the other hand, increasing the cost of fuel bring with it some negative impacts that the poverty is the main one. It refers to those kind of application that have to use fuel. Public transformation system is an outstanding instance. When the cost of fuel surge, the cost of thicket would boost and people have to pay more. Also, in such circumstances, the risk of smuggling would increase that causes some negative effect on the society.
Taking everything into consideration, it seems that the solution to solve the environment problems is lined outside the expensive fuel, however this idea can decline the amount of unnecessary consumption of fuel. There are many fundamental steps that should be taken to save the environment in long term.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-30 | yaldaasgari | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-20 | rynana | 56 | view |
| 2018-06-19 | Nguyen Tan Tien | 80 | view |
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide (co2) emission per person in the united kingdom, sweden,italy and portugal between 1967 and 2007. 67
- The graph below gives information about U S government spending on research between 1980 and 2008 91
- The chart below shows the percentage of total US population aged 65 and over between 1900 and 2000. 78
- The table below shows the number of cars made in Argentina, Australia and Thailand from 2003 to 2009. 73
- Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones in communication has negative effects on young people s reading and writing skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'contributed'.
Suggestion: contributed
...in challenges of present modern era are contribute to the environment and its problems. A ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'those kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; those kinds
...e poverty is the main one. It refers to those kind of application that have to use fuel. P...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, then, i think, kind of, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00308641975 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79797016099 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549382716049 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.137109228 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.785714286 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145781299951 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477230912464 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442686781111 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086552710492 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345039293948 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.