Better for companies to make long last products, others think that it is the most important thing is cheap prices. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
While some individuals believe the quality of products is the best for companies, others say low prices are better. There are arguments on both sides of this very topical debate, and I will discuss then now.
There are several reasons why companies should save quality of their output. Firstly, lots of clients search a good products, that serve for a long term and indestructible during use. When people try to buy new product they check it for durability and then pay for that. Secondly, companies can make big profit from good quality and high price product. This can be help to stuff and provider for row-materials.
On the other hand, some people believe that companies should focus on cheap prices. They highlight the low prices on the market are affordable and likely for everyone even they rich or poor. For example, customers sometime compare prices and choose the cheapest one. They also say that, the product tax are proportional for its price, low price means low tax. While governments require taxes for every output companies should lower the price, if they want to avoid big amount of tax. Furthermore, low priced companies can make deal with partners and make huge profits in this way.
In conclusion, there are convincing arguments both for and against better for companies is good quality or cheap price, but I believe that both last-long and cheaper products can make lots of patronages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-22 | farhodyusupov | 53 | view |
| 2021-03-22 | farhodyusupov | 56 | view |
| 2021-03-22 | farhodyusupov | 56 | view |
- Better for companies to make long last products others think that it is the most important thing is cheap prices Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam How true do you think this statement is What measures can governments take to discourage people fro using their cars 56
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 116, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'product'?
Suggestion: product
... Firstly, lots of clients search a good products, that serve for a long term and indestr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ompanies is good quality or cheap price, but I believe that both last-long and ch...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 41.998997996 45% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1173.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 237.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94936708861 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47402788426 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582278481013 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4804999597 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7857142857 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9285714286 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319136518027 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113636916737 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078090834589 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226759027501 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765723915642 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.