In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.
Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In recent years, the number of people who live in nursing homes in England, Wales and Scotland has been increasing. Some people believe that the family should pay for the care of nursing homes. However, I argue that the government should take responsibility for the cost. The first reason is that some people are too old to pay for the care of other family members and the second reason is that some families cannot afford to pay for the care.
The government should pay for the cost of nursing homes because some family members are also too old to pay for the cost of care. Some countries have an aging population due to healthier lifestyles and the advanced state of medical technology. Take Japanese society as an example; it is predicted that one-third of the population in 20 years will be over 65 years. This means that 70 year old people might have to pay for the care of their elderly parents in the future. I therefore believe that taxpayer money should pay for elderly care.
The second reason is that the financial situation varies depending on the family. In the case that families cannot afford to pay for the cost, they have to take care of their elderly loved ones. While some people think it is natural to take care of elderly people and they are willing to bath them, feed them and shower them, other people find it very difficult. It is not uncommon that family members use financial, physical, and psychological abuse on their elderly parents because of the stress from taking care of them. For example, there were an increase in the number of cases of euthanasia in countries where this is legal during the recent global economic recession.
In conclusion, I strongly agree with the idea that the state should pay for the care of the aged because some family members are too old to pay for them and it might be a heavy burden to take care of them at home. Therefore, the government should establish their pension system for the care of elderly citizens.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-24 | ankushelixir09 | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-24 | ankushelixir09 | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-24 | ankushelixir09 | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-24 | ankushelixir09 | 78 | view |
| 2021-03-10 | rajpatel90 | 56 | view |
- The bar chart below shows employment figures in different tourism related industries between 2009 and 2019 85
- Some people prefer to shop for food in the supermarket other people prefer to do their food shopping online Discuss both the views and give your opinion 67
- Some cites have few controls over the design and construction of housing and office buildings People think that they should be free to choose the design they like Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The pie chart shows the online sales for retail sectors in Canada in the year 2005 2010 The pie chart shows the online sales for retail sectors in Canada in the year 2005 2010 64
- The chart show fresh fruit exports in 2010 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 286, Rule ID: TO_BATH[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to bathe'?
Suggestion: to bathe
... of elderly people and they are willing to bath them, feed them and shower them, other ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64957264957 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33947721233 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.430199430199 0.561755894193 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3529203967 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9375 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.449937920205 0.244688304435 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169864769333 0.084324248473 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114393206304 0.0667982634062 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.326045027213 0.151304729494 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598124850013 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 286, Rule ID: TO_BATH[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to bathe'?
Suggestion: to bathe
... of elderly people and they are willing to bath them, feed them and shower them, other ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64957264957 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33947721233 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.430199430199 0.561755894193 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3529203967 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9375 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.449937920205 0.244688304435 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169864769333 0.084324248473 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114393206304 0.0667982634062 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.326045027213 0.151304729494 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598124850013 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.