Buying things on the Internet, such as books, air tickets and groceries, is becoming more and more popular.
Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Nowadays, it is true that more and more people have chosen online shopping as their shopping method. Despite having its own drawbacks, shopping on the Internet has brought a lot of benefits to the customers.
On the one hand, this way of shopping has tremendous advantages. First, it’s undeniable that the Internet has changed our consuming behaviors and made it a lot more easier for people to purchase their goods. We have past the days when we have to go to supermarket to buy groceries or to a bookstore to buy books, now everything can be done in just a simple click. For instance, to buy airplane tickets, I don’t have to take the time to go a travel agency, I can just stay at home and make the purchase on the airline’s website. Secondly, this convenience of online shopping helps companies lower the cost of production and delivery, thus resulting in the reduction of prices. Finally, people can make comparisons of products on the Internet, which help them purchase the product with the best price & quality.
On the other hand, online shopping still have some drawbacks. It might contain some risks in the process of online transactions which could leak people’s confidental credit card informations. For example, a few months ago, a Vietcombank user reported being stolen 1 billion VND in her bank account by hackers. The indicent happened after the customer made a purchase on the internet. Furthermore, not all the shopping websites can be trusted beucase the quality of their products may not stay true to what is advertised. Consumers can also be easily swayed by advertisements on the Internet and end up buying goods impulsively.
In conclusion, online shopping is clearly a modern advance and it will shape up the way we purchase goods in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...r consuming behaviors and made it a lot more easier for people to purchase their goods. We ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, may, second, secondly, so, still, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98006644518 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88460773762 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578073089701 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3395870241 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9333333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.73333333333 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142233693491 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526910420106 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385621473851 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940751312299 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451533326786 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.