Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past 30 years in the world that many cities now are "one big traffic jam". Do you think that this statement is true? What measure can government take to address this problem?

Since last few decades, there has been a burgeoning growth in the number of four wheelers entering the roads, especially in the urban areas. While for a majority of people car is needed for faster commute, it is undeniable that the same need is resulting in road blocks and thereby longer travel times. However, there are certainly some alternatives which can work against such challenges.

To elaborate, owing to the improved economic stature and affordability, the percentage of car owners increased by multi folds. Particularly, in some countries such as India where buying a car was once a dream, hundreds of automobile manufacturers have now entered the markets. In certain households, there is more than single car, but at what cost to others?

Alongside different types of pollution, traffic jams have become a growing concern across all major cities in the world. Nevertheless, lawmakers can take few initiatives to rescue its citizens from this issue. Firstly, by encouraging people to use public transit, many personal vehicles can be stopped from stepping on road.

Secondly, cars with multiple passengers must be allowed to travel toll-free. For instance, California allows its public to travel for free on HOV lanes while participating in carpools. Thirdly, imposing huge levies on each additional car bought by a family, a sense of fear can be inculcated in buyers. That being said, individuals too should take the responsibility by extending their support to government-initiated measures whenever possible.

In essence, while it is undeniable that a rapid increase in number of four-wheelers is causing severe traffic jams, lawmakers can try some options to minimize such issues. After all, there is no problem without a solution.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, after all, for instance, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35740072202 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03845039323 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.682310469314 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1143473437 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9333333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158784915316 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464140435806 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304405371422 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0798131690895 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379709170268 0.056905535591 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.