The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates of the British people spent their money to donations different type of ages for two years, 1999 between 2010. It is measured in a percentage. Overall, it can be seen that, people spent money for to, charity these charities were given higher percentages in 36-50 ages.
Donations of people were given about the proportion of 17 for two 18-25 ages in 1990. By 2010, given donations declined dramatically the percentage of 7 in these ages. For to 26-30 ages were spent charity the percentage of 30 in 1990 and for 2010 people spent money was about 25%. In 36-50 ages saw high charity percents of 42 in 1990.
However, these progresses were not increased as past year in 2010, in this year, given money for charity declined significantly was around in 35. Afterwards, percentage of donation for 51-65 ages witnessed slight decrease in 35% for 1990 and these ages saw a bit higher percent of 39% for 2010. In donation of 65 ages experienced the percentages of 33 in 1990. By 2010, these progresses increased significantly than 1990 year.
- These days more and more people are going to other countries for significant periods of time either to travelling Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of taravelling in a foreign country 56
- Transport preferences amongyoung people from different countries 73
- The pie chart below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 67
- The diagram below shows how raw materials are used to make plastic products Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
- The chart below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 2021 and future projections for 2025 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 1615.20841683 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 183.0 315.596192385 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8306010929 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6834996802 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 176.041082164 52% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497267759563 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 251.1 506.74238477 50% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1038164289 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.3636363636 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6363636364 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 7.06120827912 14% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277496113693 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122773632149 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530408134654 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214457608929 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00548277253402 0.056905535591 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 50.2224549098 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.85 8.58950901804 80% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 78.4519038076 36% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.