Companies use major sporting events to promote their products. Some people think it has a negative effect on sport in general. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, there are more and more agencies organizing major sporting events to advertise their commodities. Nonetheless, some individuals believe it will bring tremendous consequences to sports generally. From my perspective, I strongly disagree about that statement.
Advertising goods through sponsoring sporting events brings numerous advantages for those organizations. To begin with, it is believed to gain a huge profit for promotion businesses. With high viewing from viewers on the social media sites and attractive competitions, companies would profit from that advertising and gain advocacy from sports fans. For example, Pepsi has gained a big revenue from promoting their beverages by Ronandol in an interview sports and it received numerous orders from that occasion. As a result, it will enhance corporations’ brands and revenues from product commercials through sporting occasions.
Not only does it benefit firms, but it is also advantageous for sporting attendees in terms of providing sports supplies. It is considered to facilitate competitors to concentrate more on their matches. There would be no fear of the shortage of rehearsing funds and participants will be guaranteed from supplying free sports items to ensure focus on competitions. For instance, Tokyo Olympic 2021 supplied a lot of sports tools for candidates, which facilitated them to have one of the best experiences to be ready for attending their matches. Thereby, sporting candidates would be ensured to have better experiences regarding sports facilities and supplies.
In conclusion, it cannot be denied that there are a large number of benefits not only for advertising organizations but also for sports competitors. In my view, I agree that promoting products through major sporting events would boost companies' revenues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 51, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ion, it cannot be denied that there are a large number of benefits not only for advertising organ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, nonetheless, regarding, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63405797101 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12884713833 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594202898551 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2322784648 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.666666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252616165885 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987005455676 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663457454894 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17674612409 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371595316544 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.