As computers are being used more and more in education, there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, the question of whether computers can substitute for teachers or not has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although the use of computer in education is not without advantages, the role of teachers should be not be underestimated.
On the one hand, there are many merits of adopting computer in teaching. First, since on the internet there are thousands of domestic and international knowledge with high-solution graphic, visual effects and colourful images, students can enable expose to such information with a click of a mouse through computers which triggers their students's curiosity to research and find out new horizons, new culture, new lands. Plenty of evidence suggests that some parents choose for children to learn distantly from school to avoid bullying and being abused. Second, by using computers frequently, students will foster their computer skills which are conducive to their future work and career. This means that to be lagged in the 4th industrial revolution, learners have to catch up with the latest technology, which at least is familiar in the classroom at school.
On the other hand, there are numerous reasons why teachers should dominate class rather than computers. First, since just teachers, not computers, have enough educational command to guide students, they cannot be marginalized. Teachers are indeed more flexible than a machine in answering all questions or confusion of students, especially unusual and unprecedented questions, thus helping them gain a deeper understanding of any topics taught. Second, by conduction a variety of activities in class, teachers will assist leaners to enhance their social skills. It is true that through presentations, discussions, students can foster their soft skills, such as communication, problem-solving skill and logical thinking ability which is advantageous for their cognitive development.
In conclusion, notwithstanding the use of computer can reap several benefits in education, the teacher's role will not be replaced and neglected. By combining two forms of lecturing, teachers and schools should gain the best learning approach for students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-22 | ulligadda sreeja | 73 | view |
| 2020-04-23 | lynkchillie0911 | 89 | view |
- Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines Should parents be made by law to immunize their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunize their children 73
- As computers are being used more and more in education there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom Do you agree or disagree 89
- Studies have suggested that children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things What are the reasons and what measures should be taken to reduce the time children spend watching TV and encourage c 84
- Children s education is expensive In some countries the government should pay for some of or all of the costs Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages 92
- Studies have suggested that children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things What are the reasons and what measures should be taken to reduce the time children spend watching TV and encourage c 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
Nowadays, the question of whether computers can substitute for teachers o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 96, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...reap several benefits in education, the teachers role will not be replaced and neglected...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, thus, at least, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58841463415 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05171657403 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621951219512 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.3283806649 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.928571429 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28283815873 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974183610212 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884388119753 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192597822926 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729545602983 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.