It is undoubtedly true that countries are becoming more homogenous than before since the products demand on their citizens are more similar. I suppose that it has more benefits rather than drawbacks.
The negative impact on this case is the lost national culture gradually. This is because every countries have own characteristics that make them different with others and the ability to buy same products will degrade their cultures. For instance, every countries have their national and traditional cuisine since long time ago ut since the establishment of fast food make people lead to buy fast food especially in developing countries. In Jakarta, capital city of Indonesia, has traditional food called ketoprak and the interest of customers to buy have lost periodically that influenced by increasing number of fast food restaurant like KFC and McDonald’s. Thus, this evidence has negative effect on traditional heritage.
Thought it has negative development, this evidence towards more positive development, mainly on economic aspect. It is clear that third-world countries need to grow their economic and this event will lead them to economic growth. This is because when products demand are becoming more similar will force the multinational companies to develop their factories closer to their customers, including in middle-low economic countries. It will affect on increasing of countries revenue through tax policy, gaining job vacancy for people, and rising the rate of economic level of countries and people there. This evidence has happened in China, most of global companies established their fabrics there and it directly impact on national income and make them to be the second largest economic countries after USA. Hence, this event has more benefits for countries.
In short, although it might seem sensible that products demand are becoming more similar lead to negative effect. I prefer it has more positive effect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 439, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... middle-low economic countries. It will affect on increasing of countries revenue through...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 712, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'impacts'?
Suggestion: impacts
...hed their fabrics there and it directly impact on national income and make them to be ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, second, third, thus, for instance, i suppose, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48504983389 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81554356578 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498338870432 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1208638682 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.066666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357209538882 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130110508894 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689912248245 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230265714782 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041619891978 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.