The Post-1991enactment of liberalization, privatization, and globalization has made it much easier for people to buy anything they desire from across the globe with negligible restraints, which has led countries to look indistinguishable. This phenomenon has emanated copious boons and banes. Some advocate its meritorious end whereas others contradict its applications. However, the bright side of this notion, as per my discretion, overweighs its dark side.
The predominant benefit that magnetizes people is that it catalysts the economy of the countries involved. It creates a win-win situation. For illustration, suppose if any country is veteran in making handicrafts and another is a virtuoso in technology; both can satisfy their needs by exchanging their expertise. This helps them to grow simultaneously. They, moreover, better understand each other in every aspect, and help each other to get developed and advanced. Relation of India and Japan is the paradigm of this conception. Secondly, tourists feel much familiar when they go to some other country. To exemplify, when people see McDonald in another country they feel as they are in their home-country as it is omnipresent across the globe.
Despite its numerous advantages, critics opine that buying things from outside one's country has contaminated and is eating-up their culture, environment, and their unique identity. For instance, the dominant presence of western brands has smashed the indigenous uniqueness of many countries; now people prefer foreign brands to their domestic brands. As per the findings of an accredited survey, it is found that people are giving undue preference to foreign country's good as they feel their domestic products as inferior. Alternatively stated, when people make purchases from overseas and try to turn their exterior into foreign outlook, they tend to lose their intrinsic quality and stop valuing their culture.
To recapitulate, I would like to subsume the whole discussion by asserting that the given concept has umpteen explicit as well as implicit advantages and disadvantages. However, in today's scenario, increasing similarity among countries seems to have more merits over its demerits as it accelerates the growth of an economy and leads to a win-win situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 714, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...quality and stop valuing their culture. To recapitulate, I would like to subsume...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1939.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5558739255 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15278965263 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607449856734 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8258790363 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.722222222 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3888888889 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133828862467 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402719336497 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0308149710312 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0766028081516 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00964334143352 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.