Applied science has generated significant positive impacts in a crime field. Owing to the unconventional mechanisation, many nations have witnessed a marked slump in the proportion of unlawful acts as opposed to antecedent times. I completely agree with the idea that the leading technology can deter and address crimes effectively. This essay will support my opinion with relevant examples.
To begin with, installing surveillance cameras has become immensely powerful in restricting outrageous behaviours. As cameras can capture a complete identity and illegal movements, which usually forms a solid basis for evidence in courts, most law breakers feel intimidated to commit crimes. Next, Global Satellite Positioning System remains a valuable tool to prevent stealing of automobiles from extreme gangsters. Crooks are often easily demoralised to carry out crimes because police can know precise whereabouts, speed and direction of the vehicle by virtue of the installed tracking device in the carrier. Therefore, it ascertains why monitoring cameras and GPS system is highly potent in limiting delinquencies.
A part from a crime prevention, taking advantage of technology such as DNA fingerprinting and social media, police are adressing sophisticated crimes readily. For example, DNA based investigation led to successful capture of a suspect who was involved for at least 22 sexual assaults and robberies. Moreover, DNA of every individual is unique, making this type of examination a very useful mean of identifying cryptic criminals. Secondly, social media such as Facebook and Twitter tend to become extremely worthwhile in solving crimes since the majority of offenders are commonly found to share their activities using these platforms. As a consequence, officers are generally ironing out crimes via tips gleaned from Facebook posts.
In conclusion, it is clear that the above mentioned technological developments seem entirely worthy in limiting and dealing crimes because of the accuracy and creation of continuing anxieties among villains.
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: A part from a crime prevention, taking advantage of technology such as DNA fingerprinting and social media, police are adressing sophisticated crimes readily.
Error: adressing Suggestion: No alternate word
flaws:
Need to mention: 'The crime rate nowadays is decreasing compared to the past' across the essay. The topic is not just : 'advanced technology can prevent and solve a crime.Do you agree or disagree?'
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 306 350
No. of Characters: 1716 1500
No. of Different Words: 216 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.182 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.608 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.009 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 147 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 116 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 83 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 56 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.4 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.041 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.467 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.284 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.508 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.017 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, at least, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75163398693 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10256556906 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.692810457516 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.311322857 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.333333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190622131915 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559261120648 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600098705803 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103681388808 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217589066919 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.23 8.58950901804 131% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.