In the present age, it seems that despite numerous food resources around the world, demands are rising frequently. In fact, these lack of foods rooted in natural disasters, overpopulated areas and others. To address these problems, international government and societies should manage the situation by exposing new approaches.
To begin with, numerous natural catastrophic incidents are happened such as earthquake, flood or active volcanos which are reasons for devastating yields and crops from cultural regions. Furthermore, global population is increasing especially in territories of Africa continents. In fact, rate of birth in these areas is uncontrollable, also people are suffering from poverty as well as starvation. Therefore, demand for nutrition for these types of people are more than other places. Moreover, statistics exhibit that in first world countries, large content of food is wasted. If these foods can be preserved, global starvation would be eliminated forever.
On the other hand, however, this is a public concern that demands for foods are going up, there should be appropriate methods to solve the problems. I believe that, it is better for international countries to have some contracts about precise plans to control birth rate in the world. Actually, this can be shown to people with advertisements or educations. Additionally, development countries can have corporation with poor areas to help them in how to perform novel methods of plantation without irrigation (for desert regions). Besides, financial support is exceedingly important that should be cared more.
In conclusion, although, demands for foods is growing as a global trouble, there are optimal approaches that are possible to carry out by international communities. Hence, majority of worrying terms might be solved.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, as to, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61454545455 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04814047094 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632727272727 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1091667942 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1875 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203230840003 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635486630606 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471539638872 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125793147796 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00836030516425 0.056905535591 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.