Despite the best effort of crime fighting organisations crime will never be eradicated from civilized society to what extent do you agree or disagree?
The incidence of crime is increasing day by day even with strict crime fighting measures by State authorities. As a matter of fact, crime will not be eradicated from our society. I too share a similar view.
It is true to certain extent that, since, with the stringent implementation of certain rules and regulations against crime will discourage individual from committing crimes. This is to say, the fear among the public about the negative consequences of attempting a crime would definitely create an insight and they will avoid such occurrence. For example, presence of cctv camera surveillance in the public place such as railway station, ATM counters, airport, Shopping Complex will avoid the incidents of crimes and robbery as the criminals know they are prone to caught by the police or other crime fighting organisations. Moreover, the constant supervision of police officers in the city will avoid people to commit crime. Hence it is believed by a few that the incidence of crime can be reduced to a certain extent with the above mentioned services.
Despite the above said, I, strongly am of the opinion that the incidents of crime will not be eradicated as many other reasons pushes peoples to commit crime. One of the reason is poverty. To be specific, unless the State authority would take measures to alleviate poverty they can't do nothing to reduce the crime rate.This is to say, most of all criminals come from poor family where they didn't get enough money for meeting their basic needs and at last they will ended up in doing robbery and serious crime. For instance, a survey conducted by Kerala Police authority found that 72 percentage of the total robbery is done by people who suffered from poverty. Another reason to support my view is that, the poor punishment strategies by the goverment. This would mean that, many criminals can easily come out from their criminal offences as there is no strict punishment because of their political influence or status of living. Thus, such kind of improper attitude towards criminals will not favour a nation to eradicate crime.
In conclusion, although, there are strict rules and regulations in every country to avoid crimes such activities are not at all practical implemented by many countries. Therefore, there is no sense in arguing that crimes can eradicate or even produced.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 727, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...city will avoid people to commit crime. Hence it is believed by a few that the incide...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...take measures to alleviate poverty they cant do nothing to reduce the crime rate.Thi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 320, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...ant do nothing to reduce the crime rate.This is to say, most of all criminals come f...
^^^^
Line 5, column 391, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...minals come from poor family where they didnt get enough money for meeting their basi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 466, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'end'
Suggestion: end
...their basic needs and at last they will ended up in doing robbery and serious crime. ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot favour a nation to eradicate crime. In conclusion, although, there are stric...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a matter of fact, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1970.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 391.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03836317136 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67745010871 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.4790467957 49.4020404114 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.882352941 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.82352941176 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 3.9879759519 376% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300539101398 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103831911223 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787524890449 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197276248963 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521121352633 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.