Detailed description of crimes on newspaper and TV can have bad consequences on society, so this kind of information should be banned in the media. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, many people believe that some sources of information such as newspaper and tv contain descriptions of crimes which are very detailed so this news should be banned to avoid bad consequences to readers and audiences. In my perspective, I completely agree with this view for several reasons.
The first argument given to support is that those audiences also are children and this age group is easy to influence by unusual news. In fact, they are curious about how society is running by others and still can not distinguish right from wrong effectively. this is a great condition for bad things in order to approach young people, which is likely to lead them to criminal activities later in life. Moreover, not only children but also mature group is affected by this type of information. The older ones will have a negative thought about their community that trusts in the authorities will be alleviated.
Another rationale behind my belief is that the government should replace these detailed descriptions with general ones. The contents of each article need to be restricted or filtered. In other words, they need to handle under the management of someone who has responsibility for its appearance such as inspector or censor. As a matter of fact, there are many ways to influence news so that by using alternative words and pictures with less violent sounds will introduce a better outcome. if the editorial office can make this move, it is helpful for everyone including the authorities.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that many descriptions about crimes in newspaper and tv should be stopped because of how dangerous these can be for some groups of society and if it is important news, management before releasing is needed
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...stinguish right from wrong effectively. this is a great condition for bad things in ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 489, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...sounds will introduce a better outcome. if the editorial office can make this move...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, still, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0553633218 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80013973896 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598615916955 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2250556298 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.384615385 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278404617456 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820950676118 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897548858447 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182287051876 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0973291561675 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.