Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, it is an increasingly significant fact that adults pay an enormous amount of attention on children’s education. Each parent wants to provide the highly quality educational resource to their kids and ensure the learning circumstances which their children could concentrate on course around is disturbed. Therefore, some people in favor of unfolding coaches isolating disruptive school pupils. By contrast, someone holds a favorable appraisal of training every student together. From my perspective, naughty school students should be trained partly.
Tutorial guidance accord with their personality is accessible. Instructors could conduct a divers teaching plan for each class and it is benefit to promote the teaching programs. For instance, making emphasis discipline teachers’ priority for assignments is not wrong as long as they do not flake on their normal duties aiming at disobedient students and indicators take a big proportion over the course of usual teaching program in superior class. In the situation, not only do an amount variable of pupils acquire the tutorial guidance but also the quality in coaching is efficient.
Meanwhile, students could gain more and more opportunities to develop their hobbies. The disruptive students do not have to learn oppressed and they would have chances to widen their horizons. The outstanding students would not be disrupted by others so they could concentrate on the studying.
An increasing number of people hold a point that it could result in a detrimental effect on pupils’ mental health if they were taught partly. Nevertheless, the naughty students could require tutorial guidance and many opportunities to do what they like. Overall, as far as I am concerned, it obviously that conducting the teaching program party is efficient.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58844765343 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07596481037 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606498194946 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6158459735 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.2 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183298353172 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662028257511 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681132866956 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115112034402 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588434967301 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.