Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately. Do you agree and disagree?
Education is always considered as one of the leading concerns of the society. Providing their children with a well-qualified educational environment is the primary purpose of the majority of parents. As a result, it is claimed that students should be divided into separated group based on their personality and desire for studying in order to guarantee that rebellious and naughty children will not adversely affect other students. Personally, I totally agree with this statement.
Firstly, students who are diligent and have deep awareness of the importance of learning deserve to be given the best opportunities so as to get great results. Studying with noisy kids can easily reduce other students’ focus on the lessons as they are being disturbed by the naughty all the time. For instance, according to a survey of one hundred students about the most contributing factors which can influence profoundly to learning, more than half of them chose other students. Apparently, studying in a class which everyone is hard- working and attentive can increase the pupils’ motivation and encouragement to put more efforts to their studying.
Secondly, this new learning method can be enormously advantageous to disobedient students as well as teachers. As noisy children are involved in the same group, it enables teachers to keep their pupils’ under control more easily and they can freely impose stricter punishments for these individuals without worrying being complaints by obedient students’ parents. Furthermore, teachers can prepare a different teaching program which is appropriate for these students with the aim of improving the abilities and skills of noisy children better.
In conclusion, although it is indisputable that there are still some drawbacks, I am still of the opinion that rebellious individuals ought to be grouped and study together.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 90, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to deserve'
Suggestion: to deserve
...awareness of the importance of learning deserve to be given the best opportunities so a...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 133, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...erve to be given the best opportunities so as to get great results. Studying with noisy ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eaching program which is appropriate for these students with the aim of improving...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, as to, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50519031142 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08927366646 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9805403179 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.583333333 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201147011423 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711858148582 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500801123661 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111383714676 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412786489323 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.