Do you believe that experimentation on animals for scientific purposes is justified? Are there any alternatives to animal experimentation?
Experimenting on life creatures, especially animals are widely used over the world to ensure the product quality scientifically. From my personal perspective, I believe that this method has been reasonably proven since it was first known. However, there are various ways to encourage further in the future thanks to advancement of technology.
To begin with, animals share a lot of similar characteristics with human so we can do science projects on them before taking trials for ourselves. This means we would not be aware of the consequences on our health as animals already be examined for the efficiency of medical supplies. For example, vaccine is our only reliable treatment in many dangerous diseases as it boosts the immune system in which the virus’s specimen is sent. If we do not test the vaccine carefully, we may suffer from health risks later.
Moreover, even though some people deny animals testing regarding to humanity, most of experimenting animals are common and being selected by global scientists who have sufficient experiences to make decisions. Take white rabbit as an illustration, it is multiplied in the laboratory only for scientific purposes. To sum up, there may be several concerns about animal’s experimentation, but it has been conducted through safety steps.
On the other hand, technological development also provokes more ways to do experimental researches. Artificial intelligence has been promoting in recent years because of showing data and results accurately. We should get in the habit of using machine learning frequently as it would be a new approach in technology era.
In conclusion, we can still accept experimentation on animal as it shows outstanding efficiency than any others method. Also, we can try alternative ideas regard of modern equipment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-20 | ahdbak | 73 | view |
| 2022-05-13 | ngannguyen2408 | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | stereouniverse | 89 | view |
| 2020-08-20 | sillyhazel8989 | 89 | view |
| 2020-02-17 | Thang Tran | 84 | view |
- Some people think that outdoor activities are more beneficial for children s development than playing computer games To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think that studying history is a waste of time while others think that it is essential to learn Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 73
- Do you believe that experimentation on animals for scientific purposes is justified Are there any alternatives to animal experimentation 89
- Some people think that famous people s support towards international aid organizations while others think that celebrities makes the problems less important Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 84
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen Is it positive or negative development 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...t shows outstanding efficiency than any others method. Also, we can try alternative id...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, still, for example, in conclusion, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3661971831 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16277162945 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.693661971831 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9805329786 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.6 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246195974956 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671129933025 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540935372608 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116617995266 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043637625966 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...t shows outstanding efficiency than any others method. Also, we can try alternative id...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, still, for example, in conclusion, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3661971831 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16277162945 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.693661971831 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9805329786 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.6 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246195974956 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671129933025 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540935372608 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116617995266 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043637625966 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.