Some people think that children should learn to read from traditional paper books, while others feel that it is fine to start the reading process on an ereader (like a Kindle or iPad). Discuss both sides and give your own opinion
Technology boom in last decades impacted almost everything in our daily routine. Technology is also being implemented into the primary education. While some people feel that e-readers are useful tool at beginning of reading process, I agree with those who believe that paper books have to be used in reading training.
On the one hand, it could be argued that most of the reading in adulthood is done on screen. Modern society use gadgets in everyday life to read a newspaper as well as books. However, lights exposed from screens of electronic devices have been proved to trigger a good deal of serious sickness, such as epilepsy and vision difficulties. Nevertheless, adolescence is the stage when brain functions as well as vision is developing. Furthermore, supporters of e-readers believe that virtual market is full of helpful apps, which might help to some young ones with reading difficulties, however, most of them are expensive and might be unaffordable.
However, I side with those who believe that traditional paper books are the best way how to learn to read. It is fact that many books are illustrated and allow pupils to write into them, furthermore, the ones with reading difficulties can move simple tools, like a piece of paper along the reading line. Moreover, educational books can be easily share within family for generations. Paper have shown over decades its liveability and resistance against the time. However, perhaps my strongest argument for promoting paper books against e-readers is their availability and price. Books do not require any power and are every time accessible. Schools with current cuts in their budgets are not able to purchase new technology, which follows with additional expenses like purchase of apps, it’s charging and replacing in relatively short time period. It could be argued that parents should provide gadgets to their kids, but, not every family can afford to buy an expensive equipments for their child.
In short, although most of the reading is done on scene, this negative trend negatively affects health of youth. Therefore, on balance, I believe that paper books are useful and affordable tool which can be preserve for generations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... the reading process on an ereader like a Kindle or iPad. Discuss both sides and give yo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... paper along the reading line. Moreover, educational books can be easily share wi...
^^
Line 10, column 977, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'equipment'?
Suggestion: equipment
...y family can afford to buy an expensive equipments for their child. In short, although ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, in short, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2052.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 398.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15577889447 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.668436342 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560301507538 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5170101821 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9473684211 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21052631579 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0939951126805 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0343785659007 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467059236485 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0487471970808 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448335280976 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.