As E-books are available online these days, the value of printed books has diminished. Agree or disagree?
Recently the phenomenon of reading online and its corresponding impact on declining the number of published books and magazines has sparked a heated debate. Although the role of Internet in this decline is inevitable, others hold opponents view. I am inclined to believe that this kind of reading, studying or researching can vanish all books and government should consider all its impacts.
From a social standpoint, reading on the web can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted the fact of enhancing accessibilities to the information. From my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the significant factors of the number of books in libraries and educational centers. One of the most fundamental aspects was the tendency of searching and reading on the Internet. Internet accessibilities provide a convenient substance for studying or even instructing. Furthermore, increaes the pace of reading and avoid wasting time. Thirdly, faculties, pupils and scientist have a advanced feature for searching particular topics and just by finding some keywords the process of searching become quite easy and fast.
On the one hand, there is no doubt this view has some opponents. These settlers argued that online information has little influence on killing printed books. As a tangible example, some research undertaken by a prestigious world-renowned university has asserted that societies still need to printed books. They cliamed that due to the difficulty of reading online and all its detrimental effect on eyes citizens cannot read online for a long time. this research showed that the sight diseases have increased among 30% of students who complete their dissertations online.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the existing of published books is in risk by utilizing Internet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 665, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...y, faculties, pupils and scientist have a advanced feature for searching particul...
^
Line 5, column 449, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ens cannot read online for a long time. this research showed that the sight diseases...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, still, third, thirdly, while, kind of, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04605208973 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603333333333 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.411431594 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.4 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53333333333 7.25397266985 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130879227875 0.242375264174 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397563174412 0.0925447433944 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494267926942 0.071462118173 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0801174006568 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315888133783 0.0609392437508 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.