Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of utilizing the experimental courses in the formal curriculum and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although these practical methods are beneficial as they are regarded by the substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponent views. I am inclined to believe that they can be plus as they could develop some brilliant aspects for their adherents.
From a social standpoint, learning with experience in formal education can provide both the social and educational systems with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact of modern education. According to my own experience when I was a university student, I performed an academic survey which discovered the benefits of this new way of instructing. Firstly, not only the technical lessons encounter the pupils with more details which are crucial for analyzing the process, but also they are so interesting. Furthermore, due to new and modern methods, they prepare some well-educated graduates. Moreover, the pupils who instructed by practical courses will have more job opportunities in future because of their experiments and they are well-prepared for their careers.
On the one hand, there is no doubt utilizing the practical educational methods has some opponents. These faculties asserted that these courses diminish the pupils' concentration. As a tangible example, some research undertaken by a prestigious university demonstrated that practical courses are not succeeded to comprehend the definitions among the young generations.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the merits of experimental duties in formal teaching are far more outweigh their demerits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'pupils'' or 'pupil's'?
Suggestion: pupils'; pupil's
...sserted that these courses diminish the pupils concentration. As a tangible example, s...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, moreover, so, well, while, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69811320755 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15908788112 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607547169811 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1354477571 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.833333333 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.25397266985 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11307311193 0.242375264174 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0367836889659 0.0925447433944 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451710212371 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0619794920248 0.151781067708 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366734856269 0.0609392437508 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.