Experience is more important than books and formal school education. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Recently, the phenomenon of the comparison between the theoretical and experimental activities and putting much efforts on the experimental ones and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although this idea is beneficial as it is regarded by the substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponent views. I am inclined to believe that this issue can be plus as it could develop some brilliant aspects for its adherents.
From a social standpoint, focusing on practical and experimental activities rather than reading books and formal education can provide the society with noticeable effects. From my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered these advantages. Firstly, the experienced knowledge extract from real activities by putting effort and try several ways. Hence, these activities are so detail-based and valuable. Furthermore, the formal instructing by reading books and journals or conducting research is sometimes dull and pupils may not have sufficient concentration to gain the outcomes.
On the one hand, there is no doubt that considering the practical actions rather than theoretical ones has some opponents. According to research undertaken by a pretigious world-renowned university, being well-experienced need is costly and more expensive. Due to spending more time and probably more money, these activities are gained harder by their experimenter. Also, the opponents asserted that people need to consider the for educational system which is depict all concepts and priorities.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the merits of reaching the experince instead of instructing by books and academic textbooks are far more outweigh their demerits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...and experimental activities and putting much efforts on the experimental ones and it...
^^^^
Line 5, column 461, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depicted'.
Suggestion: depicted
...der the for educational system which is depict all concepts and priorities. In conc...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, may, so, well, while, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74817518248 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23363637057 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63503649635 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9989241396 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.153846154 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120187750205 0.242375264174 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366704123501 0.0925447433944 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347018891224 0.071462118173 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636692533743 0.151781067708 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239594568143 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.33 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.