With the rise in modernization, a man has transformed his life tremendously. He has progressed from walking barefooted in the jungles to take first step on the moon. Nevertheless, there are some issues which remains irreuocable and as complex as ever. For instance, the given topic asserts that "is this true that nowadays, our earth is being filled with garbage and and other waste like plastic or polythene bags"? Through this essay, I am going to examine the possible reasons for this and suggest some practical policies that government could implement to reduce this problem.
The first step is to understand why our earth is being filled with waste material. Broadly speaking, there are main two reasons for this. The first and foremost is industrialization. There are plethora of industries that produces variety of things such as: polythene bags as well as chemicals. Industrial owners discard waste material directly into the water bodies and on land which is the main reason of producing rubbish. There are hazardous illeffects of discarding waste into rivers and land as, they reduce the fertility of soil as well as highly toxic for aquatic life. There is one option to solve this problem is to implement the rules by the governance to mend this problem by providing awareness to industrial workers about how to recycle the material to overcome the problem related to garbage.
Beside it, lifestyle of human beings is also affecting the environment. In this modern era, everyone is materialistic and prefer to spend luxury life. As, everyone wants to show his high status people especially rich people purchase things and throw them. Therefore, they are unaware about the negative impacts of rubbish which is responsible for imbalance the ecosystem. There is almost certainly no complete solution to this problem, however, there is one solution to this obstacle is to make public aware about the negative impacts of waste material like, plastic bags as well as plastic bottles and arrange seminars and street plays to council them how to reduce, recycle and reuse the thing to reduce the garbage.
In conclusion, there are variety of different factors that have led to make the problem worst while, it may not be possible to find the complete solution of this, this could probably solved by creating awareness among the individuals to reduce, recycle, and reuse the thing as well as implement the rules by the government to treat the waste material like plastic bags and other rubbish before discarding it into water bodies and on the soil.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 369, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
... our earth is being filled with garbage and and other waste like plastic or polythene b...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to spend luxury life. As, everyone wants to show his high status people especiall...
^^
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e especially rich people purchase things and throw them. Therefore, they are unaw...
^^
Line 7, column 81, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'problem the worst'.
Suggestion: problem the worst
...erent factors that have led to make the problem worst while, it may not be possible to find t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 184, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'solve'
Suggestion: solve
...e solution of this, this could probably solved by creating awareness among the individ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, well, while, broadly speaking, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2149.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 422.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09241706161 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65971906004 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507109004739 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 681.3 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 101.230652777 49.4020404114 205% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 119.388888889 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05555555556 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411810676701 0.244688304435 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111656579489 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0969608286782 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263119465337 0.151304729494 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492019216845 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.