Eating too much sugar is harmful for health. Some people think that it is government responsibility to limit people’s sugar consumption while others think that it is individual’s responsibility to limit the amount of sugar they eat. Discuss both views
I am convinced that sugar has detrimental effects on human health when it consumed in excessive amount. people differs in their opinion whether it is the responsibility of regime or people themselves to curb the consumption of sugar. In this essay, I shall shed light on both perspectives with a lucid conclusion.
To begin with, some masses alleged that it is the primary responsibility of the ministry to aware people to restrict the over use of sugar as it causes diabetes, cardiovascular problems and obesity. So, the government ought to offer the products that contain low calories so that the persons do not consume excess amount of sugar. Moreover, the administry should make aware the people to limit the use of sugar by giving advertisements on social sources like boob tube box or internet about the negative impacts of sugar by which people gain overweight as well as other health issues. In this way, the government will help the people to not use much amount of sugar.
While others argued that it is self responsibility to not eat sugary products. As the person know that from which problems they are suffering and how they have to control on that. To illustrate, if the person is suffering from obesity, must avoid the products that contain sugar and concentrate on exercises and yoga to over one the problem.
In conclusion, my personal opinion is that the people themselves are more responsible to reduce the use of sugar then government as they know that which diseases surround them.
Comments
Kindly assess the bands.
Kindly assess the bands.
Q# Eating too much sugar is harmful for our health. Some people think that it is government responsibility to limit people's sugar consumption, while others think that it is an individual's responsibility to limit the amount of sugar they eat. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Having a lot of sugar is injurious for human well-being. Not too many flocks deliberate that government is accountable to get cut-down sugar usage by inhabitants . However , others believes that it is duty of every single person to reduce the intake of sugar. As I would have it , it is debatable issue and this easy will discuss both thoughts and conclude with sound valid justifications.
To begin with, taking massive quantity of sweet is definitely cruel act of humans by themselves on their fitness level and it may lead to early diabetic illness. Undoubtedly, state authorities have legitimate power to stop excessive use with rationing through allocation of budgeted volumes. Additionally , impose higher taxes may be the means to discourage this habit. Moreover , the ruling classes must spread their awareness program vigorously because this is an immense imperative to restrict to have it. In this context , this exasperate situation should be contemplate by the government before any undone . For an instance , government charges huge duties on Tobacco to avoid smoking because it is also utmost dangers for physic.
On contrary , as it is well acquainted by everyone is engross the limit of sugar injection is immensely bewildering , yet , it is extremely efficacious that being used instead to give up. People are sweet savvy and this habit is very extreme and it's difficult to avoid it. Consequently , different diseases will take place that might impound the healthy body. In addition, everybody should try to convolute own self to disuse it and find out alternative ways to meet their desire of dessert .In particular, delinquent sugar patient takes tablet in tea to wipe out or low the tendency of sugar on a similar note sugar free tea or less weight in dishes would be an effective solution.
To sum up , I suppose government should be in action and apply numerous techniques such as increase prices , vanish from markets: artificial shortages , and convey message vigorously to populaces via advertisement by which it could be controlled and achieve latent goals. On the hand , I would say , it takes two to make a quarrel. Hence, people will debunks once they will inferior from addiction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...h when it consumed in excessive amount. people differs in their opinion whether it is ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 668, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people to not use much amount of sugar. While others argued that it is self resp...
^^^
Line 2, column 668, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...people to not use much amount of sugar. While others argued that it is self responsib...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cises and yoga to over one the problem. In conclusion, my personal opinion is th...
^^^
Line 4, column 19, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...r one the problem. In conclusion, my personal opinion is that the people themselves are more ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, then, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1253.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9137254902 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79107161108 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556862745098 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8098887959 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.909090909 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377925993135 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141034059012 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739863845689 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2149240745 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063907385966 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.