The Paris Climate Agreements require the majority of countries to take responsibilities on deminishing the exaustion of greenhouse gas. It is the frist time that the whole nations work together to solve environmental issues. Some people claim the environmental problem is enormously huge that individuals cannot relove it and only international cooperation can. Personally, I partially agree with this, but I have my own thought.
The raising of globe temperature is an immense problem that need the endeavor of all the countries. Every country emits enormous amount of carbon dioxid, which is the main reason cause the increasing of earth temperature. Consequently, the sea level will raise and the summer will be extremely hot. Only with the coorperation of every country in reducing the emission of greenhouse gas, the earth will be likely to eschew that extreme circumstance. Especially if some post industrilized countries limit their carbon dioxid emmision, the situation will be under control in the next decade.
Eventhough the international cooperation play an important role in control the emission of greenhouse gas, the individuals also can make a significant difference on environment protection. As a matter of fact, garbig classification has a sebstential contribution in the protection of environment. Firstly, recycleble materials were reused instead of decomposition in land fill. Secondly, the recycled materials cause less carbon dioxid emission compared to produce new materials from the factory. Acturally, the countries with high efficiency on rubbish recycling also enjoy an friendly and unpolluted environment, for example, like Australia and Japan.
To recapitulate, the environmental issues rise to the international stage as never happened before. Some people even consider that individuals are incapable of solving environmental problems. However, I do not share the opinion. I believe individuals cal also make a substantial difference like international cooperation. I believe the earth will be environmentally friendly with everyong contriving to protect the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n dioxid, which is the main reason cause the increasing of earth temperature. Con...
^^
Line 5, column 576, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...iciency on rubbish recycling also enjoy an friendly and unpolluted environment, fo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1802.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79421221865 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39634173002 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59807073955 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7126710163 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8421052632 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3684210526 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242061860354 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683676683522 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492493050519 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146683583651 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505819801298 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.