In contemporary times, environmental problems or climate change is a growing concern among people all around the world. Environmental complications have gone to such a position that it is not possible for a single person to solve this problem, therefore both the governments and organizations should come forward to control this problem. I completely agree with this statement.
On the one hand, to handle this issue people or the authorities can use different ways. First of all, every responsible person can attend the campaigns that are organized to clean the environment and collect the wastage for recycling. Secondly, due to the burning fuel the amount of CO2 increases day by day. According to the scientist if carbon emission is increasing at the current rate after 1 decade the global temperature will increase by 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit. As a consequence, the government should decrease the number of vehicles and should enforce the rules strictly. They should try to find an alternative way or types of vehicles such as rechargeable cars or bikes. Therefore, the emission of greenhouse gases will degrade.
On the other hand, the big organization should use renewable energy instead of using coal and fossil fuel, therefore fewer greenhouse gases will emit which will be environmentally friendly. For example, the Vietnamese government builds up renewable energy sources such as solar plants and windmills to reduce the use of other fuels. In addition, plastic is one major component that is responsible for pollution, for this reason, the government should encourage people to use organic material that is friendly for the environment. For instance, the Bangladeshi government encourages people to use organic bags to carry their daily needs instead of plastic bags, which is proven to be good for the environment.
In conclusion, to sum up, all the points above, the government can not succeed alone to solve this problem, so we the people should work with the authorities so that we can resolve this problem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25538461538 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96666130354 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566153846154 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5322955483 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.866666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28955994834 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852964974596 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662562578461 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168964175934 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403321731686 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.