Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent, do you agree or disagree?
It is commonly believed that governments have the responsibility for the protection of the environment because each person can do only a little. From my point of view, protecting the environment is not only politicians' duty but also individuals'.
On the one hand, there are some environmental problems that only governments can solve. First and foremost, only authorities can solve serious issues such as natural disasters, global warming. For example, to deal with climate change, exploiting renewable energies such as solar power systems to replace fossil fuels requires a large amount of money before taking into practice. Furthermore, if we need to solve this environmental challenge effectively, cooperation between politicians and organizations is necessary. Consequently, the government has the responsibility for the investment of sufficient funds and resources, facilities.
On the one hand, individuals also play an essential role in contributing to a clean environment. Firstly, each person has a charge to keep cleaning places around them which leads to a clean planet. To be exemplified, there are various ways of helping politicians in daily life to environmental protection such as recycling, using clean power, growing more trees to exchange oxygen. Secondly, it is obvious that without the support of citizens, environmental protection projects can not work efficiently. For instance, people should use public transportations such as buses or trains to reduce emissions that lead to air pollution rather than private vehicles.
To conclude, our planet is facing environmental problems so we need to be active now. I argue that protecting our environment is the obligation of both sides, politicians, and individuals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'politicians'' or 'politician's'?
Suggestion: politicians'; politician's
... protecting the environment is not only politicians duty but also individuals. On the on...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 584, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reducing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: reducing
...transportations such as buses or trains to reduce emissions that lead to air pollution ra...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65267175573 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34099429456 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645038167939 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1838627329 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.785714286 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188600991066 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607632301352 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048461394751 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10412767881 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437567019873 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.