Some people believe that developments in the fields of artificial intelligence will have a positive impact on our lives in the near future. Others, by contrast, are worried that we are not prepared for a world in which computers are more intelligence than humans. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
It is commonly believed that enhancements in terms of artificial intelligence (AI) may bring humans advantages in the foreseeable future. However, others fear that living in a world in which computers become smarter than people is a threat for them. From my perspective, both views have their justifications but I agree with the former one.
On the one hand, there is no denying that artificial intelligence developments have several negative impacts on human life. Firstly, AI may become a serious problem because of automation. For instance, if every machine runs based on artificial intelligence, people lose control of them easily due to making decisions without human permissions. As a result, World War III will happen and becomes a major threat to the planet. Secondly, intervening in daily life so much leads to the isolation between relationships. Using electronic devices is an example, nowadays, people depend so much on smartphones and may affect mental health.
On the other hand, AI also plays an important role in the growth of research and control. To begin with, attending and leading some specific works which are harmed people is one of the benefits. For example, applying robots in chemistry labs when starting new experiments with some liquids or solids affected people. Furthermore, not only creations, but researchers also can apply AI in aspects of predicting dangers. To be more detailed, if they use AI in the field of astronomy, it can give accurate predictions about outer space whether huge storms or disasters by satellites. It can be seen that AI assists to enhance economic growth and society.
To sum up, there are both negative and positive impacts in using artificial intelligence in life such as losing control and predicting risks. From my point of view, governments should use it in intelligent methods and avoiding risks that will happen.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... Secondly, intervening in daily life so much leads to the isolation between relation...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20065789474 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9228579503 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634868421053 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.2876513638 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.0 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8823529412 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1176470588 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246302287977 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681557584096 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679986211991 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150401537312 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059117577903 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.